- The agitation for an interim government over Monday, May 29, the inauguration has been played down
- Senior Advocation of Nigeria, Afam Osigwe, said the call for an interim government would not see the light of day
- He said no court would grant an injunction to stop May 29 inauguration while noting that previous presidential polls never adopted it
FCT, Abuja – Afam Osigwe, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, says he would be shocked if any court granted an injunction to stop the inauguration of the president-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
Osigwe, in a recent interview with Punch, gave an insight into the petition filed by the Labour Party and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) against INEC and the All Progressive Congress (APC).
Source: UGC
He pointed out that every step taken in the lead-up to the upcoming inauguration was under the statutory stipulations of the law.
He said:
“…I would be shocked if any court grants an injunction to restrain a person who has been declared the winner of an election from being sworn in.”
Osigwe further gave some precedents, like in the aftermath of the 2003, 2007, 2011 and 2019 presidential elections, where the loser went to court to challenge the winner’s victory.
He stated that in those times, the inauguration of the winner was held, and there was no injunction to halt the inauguration.
Osigwe said:
“At the return to civil reign, while Obasanjo was declared a winner, other contestants went to court. They did so in 2003, 2007, and 2011, and I think it was only in 2015 that the losers did not approach the court. In 2019, Atiku went to court, but the winners of these elections were sworn in. It never stopped anything.
“If, hypothetically, the court gives the order to remove a person, it will take effect if it is upheld by the Supreme Court. Our laws could be such that petitions are determined before swearing in; I subscribe to that.
“However, when somebody challenges your victory, there will be uncertainty until there is a final determination, but it should not stop the winner from assuming power.”
The senior advocate also noted that an interim government will only amount to anarchy as they do not have any statutory framework to govern or make and implement decisions.
He stated that the constitution provided for a change in government and all statutory processes involved in this change have been met since the conduct of the 2023 presidential polls.
He said:
“There can’t be any talk of reform outside of the constitutional framework that will not amount to some form of coup. The constitution has provided for a change of government, and that is through elections.
“An election has taken place, and a winner has been declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission.”
Source: calabargistblog.com.ng
